![]() |
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
projects
Merchandising
Site Info
AJolie.org
is an Angelina Jolie fansite. This site is unofficial and has no
connections with Angelina. I'm just a fan and I don't know her.
All content here displayed is for entertainment purposes only, it may not be redistribute or republished without permission. All graphics by Annie otherwise where stated. Webmasters: Annie, Mauricio Part of: bluestrawberry.net Hosted at: fan-sites.org Site open since: October 2004 Listed at: EliteFanPages.com, Celebrity-Exchange.com |
News & UpdatesFebruary 13, 2007
You may remember that, a while back, Angelina Jolie came out saying that adoptive parents are more fit to raise their kids than biological parents. A new study published in the American Sociological Review appears to support her contention. The study found that adoptive parents spend more money on their kids, read to them more, are more likely to eat together, and even discuss their problems more. “One of the reasons adoptive parents invest more is that they really want children, and they go to extraordinary means to have them,” says Indiana University sociologist Brian Powell, one of the study’s authors. “Adoptive parents face a culture where, to many other people, adoption is not real parenthood,” Powell added. “What they’re trying to do is compensate. … They recognize the barriers they face, and it sets the stage for them to be better parents.” Adam Pertman, executive director of the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, was appreciative of the study’s findings, but noted that “there are all sorts of families that are good for kids. Adoptive parents aren’t less good or better. They just bring different benefits to the table. In terms of how families are formed, it should be a level playing field.” I think that parents — biological, adoptive, or any other sort — are the most important part of a child’s world. How they became parents, the struggles they faced, and any other facets of the parenting adventure are simply the flavors and spices that make each family unique. The important part — the meat and potatoes — is the love that families share.
The study, published in the new issue of the American Sociological Review, found that couples who adopt spend more money on their children and invest more time on such activities as reading to them, eating together and talking with them about their problems. “One of the reasons adoptive parents invest more is that they really want children, and they go to extraordinary means to have them,” Indiana University sociologist Brian Powell, one of the study’s three co-authors, said in a telephone interview Monday. “Adoptive parents face a culture where, to many other people, adoption is not real parenthood,” Powell said. “What they’re trying to do is compensate. … They recognize the barriers they face, and it sets the stage for them to be better parents.” Powell and his colleagues examined data from 13,000 households with first-graders in the family. The data was part of a detailed survey called the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education and other agencies. The researchers said 161 families in the survey were headed by two adoptive parents, and they rated better overall than families with biological parents on an array of criteria — including helping with homework, parental involvement in school, exposure to cultural activities and family attendance at religious services. The only category in which adoptive parents fared worse was the frequency of talking with parents of other children. Alternative families may excel at parenting In particular, the researchers said, adoptive parents had a pronounced edge over single-parent and stepparent families. The researchers said their findings call into question the long-standing argument that children are best off with their biological parents. Such arguments were included in state Supreme Court rulings last year in New York and Washington that upheld laws against same-sex marriage. CLICK FOR RELATED CONTENT The researchers said gay and lesbian parents may react to discrimination by taking extra, compensatory steps to promote their children’s welfare. “Ironically, the same social context that creates struggles for these alternative families may also set the stage for them to excel in some measures of parenting,” the study concluded. Different benefits Sprigg, the research council’s vice president for policy, said he warmly supports adoption, but believes it is best undertaken by married, heterosexual couples. Adam Pertman, executive director of the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, welcomed the study’s findings, but cautioned against possibly exaggerated interpretations of it. “It’s an affirmation that there are all sorts of families that are good for kids,” he said. “Adoptive parents aren’t less good or better. They just bring different benefits to the table. In terms of how families are formed, it should be a level playing field.” The study was funded by the National Science Foundation, the Spencer Foundation and the American Educational Research Association. Powell’s co-authors were Laura Hamilton, a doctoral student at Indiana University, and Simon Cheng, a sociology professor at the University of Connecticut. One Response to “Study confirms Angelina Jolie was right”Leave a Reply |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
March 21st, 2007 at 8:40 pm
I LOVE ANGELINA JOLIE SO MUCH. SHE IS MY ANGEL. BEAUTIFUL ANGEL. I LOVE HER AND BRAD. BRAD IS VERY SMART TO PICK ANGIE. SHE BEAUTIFUL INSIDE AND OUT, TALENTED, BIG WARM HEART. I LOVE HER. WISH SHE AND BRAD LAST FOREVER. THEY ARE SO BEAUTIFUL COUPLE. THAT WHY SHILOH SO BEAUTIFUL WITH A SMALL NOSE LIKE HER MOTHER. NO NEEDS RHINOPLASTY.